4.7 Article

Fructose and Sucrose Intake Increase Exogenous Carbohydrate Oxidation during Exercise

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 9, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI AG
DOI: 10.3390/nu9020167

关键词

substrate utilization; stable isotopes; metabolism; sugar

资金

  1. Kenniscentrum Suiker & Voeding, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  2. Sugar Nutrition UK, London, UK

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Peak exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates typically reach 1 g center dot min(-1) during exercise when ample glucose or glucose polymers are ingested. Fructose co-ingestion has been shown to further increase exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of fructose co-ingestion provided either as a monosaccharide or as part of the disaccharide sucrose on exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates during prolonged exercise in trained cyclists. Ten trained male cyclists (VO(2)peak: 65 +/- 2 mL center dot kg(-1)center dot min(-1)) cycled on four different occasions for 180 min at 50% W-max during which they consumed a carbohydrate solution providing 1.8 g center dot min(-1) of glucose (GLU), 1.2 g center dot min(-1) glucose + 0.6 g center dot min(-1) fructose (GLU + FRU), 0.6 g center dot min(-1) glucose + 1.2 g center dot min(-1) sucrose (GLU + SUC), or water (WAT). Peak exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates did not differ between GLU + FRU and GLU + SUC (1.40 +/- 0.06 vs. 1.29 +/- 0.07 g center dot min(-1), respectively, p = 0.999), but were 46% +/- 8% higher when compared to GLU (0.96 +/- 0.06 g center dot min(-1): p < 0.05). In line, exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates during the latter 120 min of exercise were 46% +/- 8% higher in GLU + FRU or GLU + SUC compared with GLU (1.19 +/- 0.12, 1.13 +/- 0.21, and 0.82 +/- 0.16 g center dot min(-1), respectively, p < 0.05). We conclude that fructose co-ingestion (0.6 g center dot min(-1)) with glucose (1.2 g center dot min(-1)) provided either as a monosaccharide or as sucrose strongly increases exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates during prolonged exercise in trained cyclists.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据