4.7 Article

Prevalence and Predictors of Subclinical Micronutrient Deficiency in German Older Adults: Results from the Population-Based KORA-Age Study

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 9, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu9121276

关键词

subclinical micronutrient deficiency; vitamin D; folate; vitamin B-12; iron; predictors; older adults; population-based study; Germany

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [BMBF FKZ 01ET0713]
  2. Studienstiftung des deutschen Volkes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Subclinical micronutrient deficiency in older adults is associated with chronic age-related diseases and adverse functional outcomes. In Germany, the older population is at risk of insufficient micronutrient intake, but representative studies on micronutrient status in old and very old adults are scarce. This study's objectives were to estimate the prevalence of subclinical vitamin D, folate, vitamin B-12 and iron deficiencies among older adults, aged 65 to 93, from the KORA-Age study in Augsburg, Germany (n = 1079), and to examine associated predictors, using multiple logistic regression. Serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD), folate, vitamin B-12, and iron were analyzed. The prevalence of subclinical vitamin D and vitamin B-12 deficiencies were high, with 52.0% and 27.3% of individuals having low 25OHD (<50 nmol/L) and low vitamin B-12 concentrations (<221 pmol/L), respectively. Furthermore, 11.0% had low iron (men <11.6 mu mol/L, women <9.0 mu mol/L) and 8.7% had low folate levels (<13.6 nmol/L). Common predictors associated with subclinical micronutrient deficiency included very old age, physical inactivity, frailty and no/irregular use of supplements. Subclinical micronutrient deficiency is a public health concern among KORA-Age participants, especially for vitamins D and B-12. The predictors identified provide further rationale for screening high-risk subgroups and developing targeted public health interventions to tackle prevailing micronutrient inadequacies among older adults.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据