4.5 Article

Effect of six type II diabetes susceptibility loci and an FTO variant on obesity in Pakistani subjects

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
卷 24, 期 6, 页码 903-910

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.212

关键词

-

资金

  1. BHF [PG 008/-014]
  2. UCL NIHR (National Institute of Health Research) Biomedical Research Centre
  3. Higher Education Commission of Pakistan under the International Research Support Initiative Program [HEC 24BMS41]
  4. British Heart Foundation [RG/08/008/25291] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of the current study was to analyze the effect of six type II diabetes GWAS loci rs3923113 (GRB14), rs16861329 (ST6GAL1), rs1802295 (VPS26A), rs7178572 (HMG20A), rs2028299 (AP3S2) and rs4812829 (HNF4A), and an FTO polymorphism (rs9939609) on obesity. The probable mechanism of action of these SNPs was analyzed by studying their association with various biochemical and anthropometric parameters. A total of 475 subjects (obese=250, controls=225) were genotyped by TaqMan assay and their lipid profile was determined. Allele/genotype frequencies and an unweighted/weighted gene score were calculated. The effect of the gene score on anthropometric and biochemical parameters was analyzed. The minor allele frequencies of all variants were comparable to that reported in the original studies and were associated with obesity in these Pakistani subjects. Subjects with 9 risk alleles differ from those with <3 and overall there is no significant effect (P-value for trend 0.26). None of the SNPs were associated with any of the serum lipid traits. We are the first to report the association of these T2D SNPs with obesity. In the Pakistani population the reported effect of six SNPs for obesity is similar to that reported for T2D and having a combination of risk alleles on obesity can be considerable. The mechanism of this effect is unclear, but appears not to be mediated by changing serum lipid chemistry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据