4.2 Article

RNA sequencing and SSR marker development for genetic diversity research in Woonyoungia septentrionalis (Magnoliaceae)

期刊

CONSERVATION GENETICS RESOURCES
卷 10, 期 4, 页码 867-872

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12686-017-0884-0

关键词

Endangered tree; Genic SSR; Genetic diversity; Transcriptome sequencing; Woonyoungia septentrionalis

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC0502605]
  2. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)
  3. Collaborative Innovation Plan of Jiangsu Higher Education (CIP)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transcriptome sequencing was performed using Illumina paired-end RNA sequencing technology, for facilitating gene discovery and SSR marker development in an endangered tree, Woonyoungia septentrionalis. A total of 41,578,222 high-quality reads were obtained, and 93,156 non-redundant unigenes were assembled and annotated by sequence similarity searching in diverse public databases. Analyses showed that 36,176 unigenes (38.83%) had at least blast hit against Nr, Nt, KO, SwissProt, PFAM, KO, or GO database; and 2945 unigenes (4.13%) were annotated in all seven databases. Totally, 17,719 genic-SSRs were identified in 14,629 (15.70%) out of 93,156 unigenes. Finally, 51 primers of the 64 designed SSR primers produced clear SSR bands, of which 20 SSR loci were polymorphic in 149 individuals representing four natural populations. Observed and expected heterozygosity varied from 0 to 0.846 and from 0 to 0.792, respectively. At the species level, the Ho and He of the four W. septentrionalis populations were 0.3325 and 0.3559, respectively. The average genetic diversity within populations, H and I were 0.3500 and 0.5937, respectively. Cross-species amplification of the 20 markers was tested in other related species. The transcriptomic resources and genic SSR markers are valuable tools not only for ecological conservation of this species, but also for phylogenetic studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据