4.4 Article

MicroRNA-383-5p acts as a prognostic marker and inhibitor of cell proliferation in lung adenocarcinoma by cancerous inhibitor of protein phosphatase 2A

期刊

ONCOLOGY LETTERS
卷 14, 期 3, 页码 3573-3579

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/ol.2017.6603

关键词

microRNA-383-5p; lung adenocarcinoma; cancerous inhibitor of protein phosphatase 2A; proliferation

类别

资金

  1. Scientific and Technical Project of Henan Health Department [200804056]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-associated mortality worldwide. MicroRNAs (miRNAs/miRs) serve a role in the occurrence and development of lung cancer. The aim of the present study was to analyze the expression and function of the proliferation-associated miR-383-5p in lung adenocarcinoma (LAC). Samples of human LAC and matched adjacent normal lung tissues were surgically removed, and miR-383-5p expression and the pathological characteristics of lung adenocarcinoma were investigated. The present study revealed that miR-383-5p expression level was significantly decreased in LAC tissues and its expression levels were markedly associated with tumor size and differentiation. Over expression of miR-383-5p in A549 and H1299 LAC cell lines inhibited cell proliferation by G(1) cell cycle phase arrest and induction of apoptosis. Cancerous inhibitor of protein phosphatase 2A (CIP2A), a potential target gene of miR-383-5p, was inversely associated with miR-383-5p expression level in LAC tissues and cell lines. Furthermore, the results of the present study demonstrated that CIP2A was directly regulated by miR-383-5p and the restoration of CIP2A expression reversed the inhibitory effects of miR-383-5p on LAC cell proliferation. In conclusion, the results of the present study demonstrated that miR-383-5p was downregulated in LAC tissues. By targeting CIP2A, miR-383-5p exerts its anti-proliferative function in LAC, suggesting its use a potential novel potential prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target for LAC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据