4.6 Review

Resolving Astrocyte Heterogeneity in the CNS

期刊

FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR NEUROSCIENCE
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2017.00300

关键词

astrocyte-neuron interactions; astrocyte heterogeneity; Sonic hedgehog (Shh); notch; Fgf; Bergmann glia; Muller glia

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP 111152/MOP 123390]
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [408044-2011]
  3. Canada Excellence Research Chairs Program Government of Canada
  4. Foundation Brain Canada/W. Garfield Weston Foundation
  5. Sandra and Alain Bouchard Intellectual Disability Research Program (BIDRP)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Astrocytes play essential roles in nearly all aspects of brain function from modulating synapses and neurovasculature to preserving appropriate extracellular solute concentrations. To meet the complex needs of the central nervous system (CNS), astrocytes possess highly specialized properties that are optimized for their surrounding neural circuitry. Precisely how these diverse astrocytes types are generated in vivo, however, remains poorly understood. Key to this process is a critical balance of intrinsic developmental patterning and context-dependent environmental signaling events that configures astrocyte phenotype. Indeed, emerging lines of evidence indicate that persistent cues from neighboring cells in the mature CNS cooperate with early patterning events to promote astrocyte diversity. Consistent with this, manipulating Sonic hedgehog (Shh), Notch and fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling in the adult brain, have profound effects on the structural, morphological and physiological state of mature astrocytes. These pathways may become disrupted in various neurological diseases and contribute to CNS pathology. This mini-review article focuses on how context-dependent environmental cues cooperate with intrinsic developmental patterning events to control astrocyte diversity in vivo in order to promote healthy brain function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据