4.8 Article

Catalytic 1,2-dihydronaphthalene and E-aryl-diene synthesis via CoIII-Carbene radical and o-quinodimethane intermediates

期刊

CHEMICAL SCIENCE
卷 8, 期 12, 页码 8221-8230

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7sc03909c

关键词

-

资金

  1. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO-CW VICI project) [016.122.613]
  2. University of Amsterdam (Research Priority Area Sustainable Chemistry)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Catalytic synthesis of substituted 1,2-dihydronaphthalenes via metalloradical activation of o-styryl N-tosyl hydrazones ((E)-2-(prop-1-en-1-yl) benzene-N-tosyl hydrazones) is presented, taking advantage of the intrinsic reactivity of a cobalt(III)-carbene radical intermediate. The method has been successfully applied to a broad range of substrates with various R-1 substituents at the aromatic ring, producing the desired ring products in good to excellent isolated yields for substrates with an R-2 = COOEt substituent at the vinylic position (similar to 70-90%). Changing the R-2 moiety from an ester to other substituents has a surprisingly large influence on the (isolated) yields. This behaviour is unexpected for a radical rebound ring-closure mechanism, and points to a mechanism proceeding via ortho-quinodimethane (o-QDM) intermediates. Furthermore, substrates with an alkyl substituent on the allylic position reacted to form E-aryl-dienes in excellent yields, rather than the expected 1,2-dihydronaphthalenes. This result, combined with the outcome of supporting DFT calculations, strongly points to the release of reactive o-QDM intermediates from the metal centre in all cases, which either undergo a 6 pi-cyclisation step to form the 1,2dihydronaphthalenes, or a [1,7]-hydride shift to produce the E-aryl-dienes. Trapping experiments using TEMPO confirm the involvement of cobalt(III)-carbene radical intermediates. EPR spectroscopic spin-trapping experiments using phenyl N-tert-butylnitrone (PBN) confirm the radical nature of the catalytic reaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据