4.7 Article

Advancing Physically-Based Flow Simulations of Alluvial Systems Through Atmospheric Noble Gases and the Novel 37Ar Tracer Method

期刊

WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH
卷 53, 期 12, 页码 10465-10490

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2017WR020754

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [P2NEP2_171985]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [P2NEP2_171985] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To provide a sound understanding of the sources, pathways, and residence times of groundwater water in alluvial river-aquifer systems, a combined multitracer and modeling experiment was carried out in an important alluvial drinking water wellfield in Switzerland. Rn-222, H-3/He-3, atmospheric noble gases, and the novel Ar-37-method were used to quantify residence times and mixing ratios of water from different sources. With a half-life of 35.1 days, Ar-37 allowed to successfully close a critical observational time gap between Rn-222 and 3H/3He for residence times of weeks to months. Covering the entire range of residence times of groundwater in alluvial systems revealed that, to quantify the fractions of water from different sources in such systems, atmospheric noble gases and helium isotopes are tracers suited for end-member mixing analysis. A comparison between the tracer-based mixing ratios and mixing ratios simulated with a fully-integrated, physically-based flow model showed that models, which are only calibrated against hydraulic heads, cannot reliably reproduce mixing ratios or residence times of alluvial river-aquifer systems. However, the tracer-based mixing ratios allowed the identification of an appropriate flow model parametrization. Consequently, for alluvial systems, we recommend the combination of multitracer studies that cover all relevant residence times with fully-coupled, physically-based flow modeling to better characterize the complex interactions of river-aquifer systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据