4.6 Article

Influence of Soil Parameters on the Efficiency of the Attrition Process to Remove Metals, PCP, Dioxins and Furans from Contaminated Soils

期刊

WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION
卷 228, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s11270-017-3633-9

关键词

Soil remediation; Pentachlorophenol; Dioxins and furans; Attrition process; Initial contaminant content; Particle size

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [RDCPJ 463019-14]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of the soil parameters (particle size, initial contamination level, etc.) on the performances of an attrition process to remove As, Cr, Cu, pentachlorophenol (PCP) and dioxins and furans (PCDD/F). Five different contaminated soils were wet-sieved to isolate five soil fractions (<0.250, 0.250-1, 1-4, 4-12 and >12 mm). Five attrition steps of 20 min each, carried out in the presence of a biodegradable surfactant ([BW] = 2%, w w(-1)) at room temperature with a pulp density fixed at 40% (w w(-1)), were applied to the coarse soil fractions (>0.250 mm) of different soils. The results showed good performances of the attrition process to simultaneously remove PCP and PCDD/F from contaminated soil fractions initially containing between 1.1 and 13 mg of PCP kg(-1) (dry basis) and between 1795 and 5720 ng TEQ of PCDD/F kg(-1). It appeared that the amounts of contaminants removed were significantly correlated (p value < 0.05, R-2 = 0.96) with the initial amounts of PCP and PCDD/F, regardless of the particle size of the soils studied. The nature of the soil (granulometric distribution, pH, total organic carbon (TOC) (organicmatter) and diverse industrial origin) slightly and negatively influenced the efficiency of organic contaminants removals using attrition. However, the attrition treatment allowed an efficient removal of both PCP and PCDD/F from the coarse fraction of contaminated soil, despite the nature of the soil.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据