4.5 Article

Dynamics of a vertical-flow windrow vermicomposting system

期刊

WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH
卷 35, 期 11, 页码 1121-1128

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0734242X17725161

关键词

Large-scale windrow vermicomposting; continuous feeding; biowaste; earthworms; micro-organisms

资金

  1. Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic under NAZV project [QJ1530034]
  2. CULS Prague under CIGA project [20172018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Large-scale vermicomposting under outdoor conditions may differ from small-scale procedures in the laboratory. The present study evaluated changes in selected properties of a large-scale vertical-flow windrow vermicomposting system with continuous feeding with household biowaste. The windrow profile was divided into five layers of differing thickness and age after more than 12months of vermicomposting. The top layer (0-30cm, age <3months) was characterised by partially decomposed organic matter with a high pH value and an elevated carbon/nitrogen (C/N) ratio. The earthworm biomass was 15gkg(-1) with a population density of 125 earthworms per kilogram predominantly found in clusters. The greatest amount of fungi (3.5 mu gg(-1) dw) and bacteria (62 mu gg(-1) dw) (expressed as phospholipid fatty acid analysis) was found in this layer. Thus, the top layer could be used for an additional cycle of windrow vermicomposting and for the preparation of aqueous extracts to protect plants against diseases. The lower layers (graduated by 30cm and by 3months of age) were mature as reflected by the low content of ammonia nitrogen, ratio of ammonia to nitrate nitrogen and dissolved organic carbon, and high ion-exchange capacity and its ratio to carbon. These layers were characterised by elevated values for electrical conductivity, total content of nutrients, available magnesium content, and a relatively large bacterial/fungal ratio. On the basis of the observed properties, the bottom layers were predetermined as effective fertilisers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据