4.6 Article

Repeat measurements of uterine artery pulsatility index, mean arterial pressure and serum placental growth factor at 12, 22 and 32 weeks in prediction of pre-eclampsia

期刊

ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
卷 50, 期 2, 页码 221-+

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/uog.17403

关键词

mean arterial pressure; placental growth factor; pre-eclampsia; repeat measurements; screening; soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1; uterine artery Doppler

资金

  1. Fetal Medicine Foundation [1037116]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To investigate the potential value of repeat measurements of uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and serum placental growth factor (PlGF) at 12, 22 and 32 weeks' gestation in the prediction of pre-eclampsia (PE) developing after 32 weeks. Methods Data were derived from prospective screening for adverse obstetric outcomes in women attending their routine hospital visit at 11-13, 19-24 and/or 30-34 weeks' gestation in two maternity hospitals in England. UtA-PI, MAP and PlGF were measured. Bayes' theorem was used to combine the a-priori risk from maternal factors with UtA-PI, MAP and PlGF multiples of the median values. The performance of screening for PE developing after the 30-34-week visit by UtA-PI, MAP and PlGF measured at 11-13, 19-24 and 30-34 weeks and their combinations was examined. Results Screening at 30-34 weeks by UtA-PI, MAP and PlGF detected, at a 10% false-positive rate, 79%, 86% and 92% of preterm PE and 42%, 50% and 56% of term PE. The addition of biomarker values at 11-13 and/or 19-24 weeks was not associated with any improvement in the detection rate of preterm PE; in the case of term PE, there was a marginal (< 2%) improvement in detection for UtA-PI and MAP and a modest improvement of about 5% for PlGF. Conclusion Measurements of UtA-PI, MAP and PlGF in the first and/or second trimester have a small or no effect on improving the prediction of PE provided by screening in the early third trimester. Copyright (C) 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据