4.7 Article

Initialization of active contours for segmentation of breast cancer via fusion of ultrasound, Doppler, and elasticity images

期刊

ULTRASONICS
卷 94, 期 -, 页码 438-453

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2017.12.008

关键词

Segmentation; Breast cancer; Active contours; Initialization; Ultrasound; Elastography; Doppler image

资金

  1. Thailand Research Fund [BRG5780012]
  2. Center of Excellence in Biomedical Engineering, Thammasat University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Active contours (snakes) are an efficient method for segmentation of ultrasound (US) images of breast cancer. However, the method produces inaccurate results if the seeds are initialized improperly (far from the true boundaries and close to the false boundaries). Therefore, we propose a novel initialization method based on the fusion of a conventional US image with elasticity and Doppler images. The proposed fusion method (FM) has been tested against four state-of-the-art initialization methods on 90 ultrasound images from a database collected by the Thammasat University Hospital of Thailand. The ground truth was hand-drawn by three leading radiologists of the hospital. The reference methods are: center of divergence (CoD), force field segmentation (FFS), Poisson Inverse Gradient Vector Flow (PIG), and quasi-automated initialization (QAI). A variety of numerical tests proves the advantages of the FM. For the raw US images, the percentage of correctly initialized contours is: FM-94.2%, CoD-0%, FFS-0%, PIG-26.7%, QAI-42.2%. The percentage of correctly segmented tumors is FM-84.4%, CoD-0%, FFS-0%, PIG-16.67%, QAI-22.44%. For reduced field of view US images, the percentage of correctly initialized contours is: FM-94.2%, CoD-0%, FFS-0%, PIG-65.6%, QAI-67.8%. The correctly segmented tumors are FM-88.9%, CoD-0%, FFS-0%, PIG-48.9%, QAI-44.5%. The accuracy, in terms of the average Hausdorff distance, is respectively 2.29 pixels, 33.81, 34.71, 7.7, and 8.4, whereas in terms of the Jaccard index, it is 0.9, 0.18, 0.19, 0.63, and 0.48. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据