4.7 Article

Lubricant-surface interactions of polymer-coated engine journal bearings

期刊

TRIBOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
卷 109, 期 -, 页码 519-528

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2017.01.017

关键词

Bearing; Journal Plain Bearings; Failures Tribochemistry Surface; Chemical analysis Spectroscopy; X-ray photoelectron

资金

  1. Daido Metal Co., Ltd - organizacni slozka
  2. Austrian COMET-Program in the frame of K2 XTribology [849109]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work provides the methodology for the improved understanding of tribocontacts with tribolayers formed from the interactions of an engine oil and the surface of a journal bearing under boundary lubricating conditions. In particular, advanced surface characterisation combining X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and high resolution mass spectroscopy (MS) contributed to integrated knowledge on tribochemical and tribomechanical processes in the tribocontact studied. An engine connecting rod bearing lubricated with commercial OW-20 GF5 engine oil was evaluated as part of the tribosystem. Bearing material was a recently developed polymer-based overlay which increased in popularity in the automotive market owing to the durability and superior tribological properties. After engine bench tests and fatigue experiments, conventional oil analyses showed only minor changes regarding oil chemistry whereas MS revealed significant additive degradation, e.g., formation of organic phosphates from ZDDP and depletion of tris(2,4-di-tert-butylphenyl) phosphite additive. Regarding the fatigue experiments, surface analysis by XPS showed the formation of tribofilms with a thickness only in the range of a few nanometers and composed of P, S and Zn, i.e., mainly elements in ZDDP. This publication reports for the first time on surface characterisation by laser desorption ionisation MS applied to engine journal bearings: the presence of an organic phosphorus compound the origin of which is assumed from ZDDP could be revealed by this approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据