4.4 Article

Behavioral weight-loss treatment plus motivational interviewing versus attention control: lessons learned from a randomized controlled trial

期刊

TRIALS
卷 18, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13063-017-2094-1

关键词

Obesity; Motivational interviewing; Behavioral weight loss; Motivation; Treatment

资金

  1. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
  2. Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research
  3. Killam Trusts
  4. Canadian Psychological Association (CPA Foundation)
  5. University of Calgary

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Studies evaluating the benefit of adding motivational interviewing (MI) to behavioral weight-loss programs (BWLPs) have yielded mixed findings. Methods: The aims of this randomized controlled trial were to: (1) assess the efficacy of adding MI to a BWLP on weight loss and adherence among 135 individuals with overweight and obesity (77.8% female; mean BMI = 33.6 kg/m(2)) enrolled in a 12-week BWLP and (2) explore levels of importance, confidence, and readiness for change ratings. Results: Participants, who were randomized to receive two MI sessions or two attention control sessions, were assessed at baseline, the end of the BWLP, and 6 months post BWLP. Both groups decreased their weight from baseline to the end of the BWLP; however, there was no weight change in either group when measured between baseline and 6 months post BWLP. We observed no group differences in importance, confidence, and readiness for change after each session. Conclusions: We highlight some important lessons learned from the present trial that can be applied to MI + BWLP research. Participants may not have benefited from MI because they were already highly motivated to change, which highlights the importance of pretreatment assessment. Findings also suggest that treatment monitoring may help to enhance MI + BWLP efficacy by guiding a stepped-care approach that identifies individuals for whom additional MI sessions are needed, and when. A focus on refining elements of treatment remains an important direction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据