4.3 Article

Korean Version of the Mini-Mental State Examination Using Smartphone: A Validation Study

期刊

TELEMEDICINE AND E-HEALTH
卷 23, 期 10, 页码 815-821

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2016.0281

关键词

smartphone; cognition disorders; stroke; telemedicine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Stroke often leads to disability, and poststroke survivors often have limited accessibility to medical facilities. Introduction: For such patients, mobile videoconferencing technology offers an opportunity to perform follow-up assessment and appropriate management of cognitive impairment. We aimed to determine the validity of the Korean version of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE-K) when administered using a smartphone. Materials and Methods: Thirty patients with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke were included in this study (20 males, 10 females; mean age, 69.8 +/- 12.9 years). Both face-to-face and remote assessments of cognitive function through MMSE-K were performed for each patient at an interval of at least 3 days. Additionally, an in-person collaborator evaluated the MMSE-K score during the remote assessment. A smartphone and a tablet were used by the patient and the examiner, respectively, and remote connection was mediated using a dedicated videoconferencing application. The MMSE-K scores obtained through face-to-face, remote, and in-person assessments were compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test and the Spearman correlation analysis. Results: There was good agreement between face-to-face and remote assessments, as well as between remote assessment and in-person collaborator's evaluation regarding total MMSE-K score and subscores for each MMSE-K domain (orientation, memory, attention/calculation, language, and visuospatial function). Discussion: Remote assessment can be a useful clinical evaluation method, and this study confirmed the validity. Conclusions: The smartphone represents a promising tool for the assessment of cognitive function in clinical practice, but further research into the intra- and inter-rater reliability of observations is warranted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据