4.7 Article

Microstructural and fatigue behavior of cold sprayed Ni-based superalloys coatings

期刊

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
卷 324, 期 -, 页码 390-402

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2017.06.006

关键词

Cold spray; Ni-based superalloy; Processing parameters; Fatigue

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present paper, the microstructural and mechanical properties of Ni based superalloys coatings, cold sprayed on C steel substrates, are analyzed. Different coatings were produced by varying the processing parameters (gas and temperature, pressure and spraying distance) in the ranges 700-850 degrees C, 3.5-4 MPa and 20-60 mm respectively. Optical microscopy was employed for the microstructural characterization and the porosity measurement of the produced coatings. Various experimental evidences underline the possibility of performing repairs through cold spray because of the good level of adhesion achievable by employing optimal processing parameters. In the present paper, the potential repair of cracked steel sheets by employing cold spray technology is presented. 60 degrees and 90 degrees V-type surface notches, machined on carbon steel panels, have been repaired by using Diamalloy cold sprayed powders. The microstructural behavior of the produced coatings was analyzed through optical and scanning electron microscopy. The mechanical properties of the coatings were evaluated through nanoindentation and adhesion tests. The fatigue properties of the coatings were analyzed, through bending tests, in order to evaluate the crack initiation and growth behavior in the coatings during cyclic loading. The K factor was quantified for the different notches geometry. In general, an increase in crack growth rate is recorded in those sheets with 60 degrees V-type notch; crack growth rate also increases as the maximum load during test increases. The cracking mechanisms were studied through SEM observations after fatigue tests. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据