4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Diagnostic study of laser-produced tungsten plasma using optical emission spectroscopy and time-of-flight mass spectroscopy

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.sab.2017.09.006

关键词

Time-of-flight mass spectroscopy; Laser induced breakdown spectroscopy; Tungsten plasma; Multi-charged ions; Dynamic plasma sheath

资金

  1. National Magnetic Confinement Fusion Science Program of China [2013GB109005]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [11175035, 11475039]
  3. Chinesisch-Deutsches Forschungs project [GZ768]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [DUTI4ZD(G)04, DUTI5RC(3)072, DUT16TD13]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, the plasma was produced by irradiating a tungsten target with an 8 ns pulsed Nd:YAG (lambda = 1064 nm) laser in a vacuum chamber under the pressure of 4 x 10(-4) Pa. The optical and particle emissions were systematically investigated using laser induced breakdown spectroscopy and time-of-flight mass spectroscopy respectively. The results showed that not only there were neutral and single ionized atoms in the laser induced plasma, but also quite a number of multi-charged ions were observed. The ion charge state was even up to 6 at the laser power density of similar to 11 GW/cm(2). Time and space resolved optical spectroscopy was investigated by using a bundle of lined fibers. Meanwhile, the time-resolved mass spectrometric study of laser produced tungsten plasma was carried out. The variation in intensities of the different species with time showed that higher charged ions reached their peak intensities earlier. This demonstrated that the higher charged ions had higher velocities and the different charged ions were separated during the expansion process. The kinetic energy corresponding to the velocity of the ions was found to increase exponentially with ionic charge state which was related to the acceleration of the dynamic plasma sheath. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据