4.5 Article

Clinical and epidemiological characteristics of acute respiratory virus infections in Vietnamese children

期刊

EPIDEMIOLOGY AND INFECTION
卷 144, 期 3, 页码 527-536

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S095026881500134X

关键词

Acute respiratory infection; children; epidemiology; Vietnam

资金

  1. Honjo International Scholarship Foundation
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [23406036]
  3. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Japan
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25460791, 23406036] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Information about viral acute respiratory infections (ARIs) is essential for prevention, diagnosis and treatment, but it is limited in tropical developing countries. This study described the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of ARIs in children hospitalized in Vietnam. Nasopharyngeal samples were collected from children with ARIs at Ho Chi Minh City Children's Hospital 2 between April 2010 and May 2011 in order to detect respiratory viruses by polymerase chain reaction. Viruses were found in 64% of 1082 patients, with 12% being co-infections. The leading detected viruses were human rhinovirus (HRV; 30%), respiratory syncytial virus (RSV; 23.8%), and human bocavirus (HBoV; 7.2%). HRV was detected all year round, while RSV epidemics occurred mainly in the rainy season. Influenza A (FluA) was found in both seasons. The other viruses were predominant in the dry season. HRV was identified in children of all age groups. RSV, parainfluenza virus (PIV) 1, PIV3 and HBoV, and FluA were detected predominantly in children aged <6 months, 6-12 months, 12-24 months, and >24 months, respectively. Significant associations were found between PIV1 with croup (P < 0.005) and RSV with bronchiolitis (P < 0.005). HBoV and HRV were associated with hypoxia (P < 0.05) and RSV with retraction (P < 0.05). HRV, RSV, and HBoV were detected most frequently and they may increase the severity of ARIs in children.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据