4.4 Article

Water Retention and Preferential States of Soil Moisture in a Cultivated Vertisol

期刊

出版社

SOIL SCI SOC AMER
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2016.06.0199

关键词

-

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and FEDER [AGL2012-40128-C03-03, AGL2015-65036-C3-3-R, FPDI-2013-16742]
  2. Junta de Andalucia [AGR-4782]
  3. IFAPA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vertisols are well suited for rainfed agriculture in water-limited environments as a result of their unique water transfer and retention characteristics. Despite their importance, the agro-hydrological behavior of these soils under seasonally dry climates is not yet fully understood. We collected water retention data for a Vertisol, measured from saturation to oven dryness on 27 undisturbed topsoil (0-0.05 m) samples from an experimental field in southcentral Spain and related this information to the occurrence of field-observed preferential soil moisture states. A continuous function was fitted to the mean gravimetric water retention data, circle minus, consisting of the sum of a double exponential model and the Groenevelt and Grant model. An inflection point at pressure head |h| = 1.1 X 10(5) cm, circle minus = 0.12 kg kg(- 1), and an equivalent pore radius, delta = 14 nm, was interpreted as the boundary between the clay inter-and intra-aggregate pore spaces, corresponding with the transition from the intermediate to the dry field soil moisture state. The mode of the textural pore space (|h| = 7.3 X 10(3) cm, circle minus = 0.21 kg kg(- 1), and delta = 200 nm) matched the transition from the wet to the intermediate field soil moisture state. We related these characteristics of the soil water retention curve with the spatiotemporal soil moisture dynamics and patterns observed in the field, characterized by fast transitions between preferential soil moisture states. The proposed framework is suitable for comparing the effects of different soil management strategies on the agro-hydrological performance of Vertisols.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据