4.4 Article

Magnetic field-enhanced sedimentation of nanopowder magnetite in water flow

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY
卷 36, 期 14, 页码 1828-1836

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2015.1013570

关键词

magnetite nanoparticles; water flow; aggregation; sedimentation; gradient magnetic field

资金

  1. Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sedimentation dynamics of magnetite (gamma-Fe3O4) nanopowder (10-20 nm) in water in a gradient magnetic field B-max = 0.3 T, (dB/dz)(max) = 0.13 T/cm was studied for different water flow speeds and starting particle concentrations (0.1 and 1.0 g/l). The aggregates formation in water was monitored under the same conditions. In cyclical water flow, the velocity of particle sedimentation increases significantly in comparison to its rate in still water, which corresponds to the intensified aggregate formation. However, at a water flow speed more than 0.1 cm/s sedimentation velocity slows down, which might be connected to aggregate destruction in a faster water flow. Correlation between sedimentation time and the nanoparticle concentration in water does not follow the trend expected for spherical superparamagnetic particles. In our case sedimentation time is shorter for c = 0.1 g/l in comparison with that for c = 1 g/l. We submit that such a feature is caused by particle self-organization in water into complex structures of fractal type. This effect is unexplained in the framework of existing theoretical models of colloids systems, so far. Provisional recommendations are suggested for the design of a magnetic separator on the permanent magnets base. The main device parameters are magnetic field intensity B >= 0.1 T, magnetic field gradient (dB/dz)(max) approximate to (0.1-0.2) T/cm, and water flow speed V < 0.15 cm/s. For particle concentration c = 1 g/l, purification of water from magnetite down to ecological and hygienic standards is reached in 80 min, for c = 0.1 g/l the time is reduced down to 50 min.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据