4.7 Article

Enhanced acetone sensing properties of monolayer graphene at room temperature by electrode spacing effect and UV illumination

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 253, 期 -, 页码 77-84

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2017.06.116

关键词

Acetone; Gas sensor; Graphene; Interdigitated electrode; UV illumination

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of the Republic of China [MOST 105-2632-E-182-001, 105-2221-E-182-066, 105-2221-E-182-057-MY3]
  2. Chang Gung Memorial Hospital [CMRPD2F0062, CMRPD2F0022, CMRPD3D0112]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An improvement in the response of a graphene-based acetone sensor is achieved by the combination of optimizing the spacing between the electrodes and UV illumination during the sensing measurement. A monolayer graphene membrane was grown on Cu foil by low pressure chemical vapor deposition, and then, it was transferred to an interdigitated electrode to achieve a resistive-type gas sensor. The response of the sensor to acetone was small without UV light illumination, but improved 7 times for an acetone concentration of 1000 ppb with UV illumination continuously applied during the measurement. In addition, the sensor response for a spacing of 400 pin was approximately 2X higher compared to that for a spacing of 50 pin for acetone concentrations of 100-1000 ppb. Furthermore, short-time UV illumination performed on these graphene-based sensors resulted in low power consumption and achieved similar results compared to continuous UV illumination. The origin of these improvements could be due to the reduction of hole carriers by oxygen and water molecule desorption from the graphene surface due to UV illumination. The surface area ratio of graphene on the glass showed a strong positive correlation to the acetone response and sensitivity, which could be related to the higher affinity in the unit sensing area. The substrate doping effect could be an important factor for the graphene-based gas sensors. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据