4.7 Article

Highly sensitive detection of acetone using mesoporous In2O3 nanospher es decorated with Au nanoparticles

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 242, 期 -, 页码 983-993

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2016.09.155

关键词

Mesoporous; In2O3 nanospheres; Au nanoparticles; Nanocompoistes; Gas sensors

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61102006, 51172095]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China [ZR2015EM019, ZR2014EL006]
  3. Shandong Province Higher Educational Science and Technology Program [J15LA56]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Surface modification with noble metal is considered as an effective strategy to enhance sensing performance of metal oxide-based gas sensors. In this work, mesoporous In2O3 nanospheres decorated with gold nanoparticles (Au NPs) have been successfully synthesized by a two-step approach including a facile hydrothermal reaction and subsequent in situ reducing process. Various techniques were employed for the characterization of the structure and morphology of as-obtained Au/In2O3 nanocomposites. The results reveal that Au NPs with average diameters of 3-5 nm are uniformly deposited on the surface of mesoporous In2O3 nanospheres with a size range of 100-200 nm, specific surface area of 40.3 m(2)/g, and average pore size of 5 nm. Importantly, the mesoporous structure, large specific surface area, and catalytic effect of Au NPs endow the Au/In2O3 nanocomposites with highly sensitive performance for acetone detection. The response value to 10 ppm acetone is about 53.08 at an operating temperature of 320 degrees C, and the response and recovery time are 4 and 9 s, respectively. The probable enhancing mechanism of as-prepared Au/In2O3 nanocomposites is discussed as well. It is expected that Au NPs-decorated mesoporous In2O3 nanosphere with excellent sensing performance is a promising functional material to actual application in monitoring and detecting acetone. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据