4.4 Review

Comparative aspects of canine and human inflammatory breast cancer

期刊

SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY
卷 44, 期 4, 页码 288-300

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2017.10.012

关键词

Inflammatory breast cancer; IBC; Comparative oncology; Dog; Canine inflammatory mammary carcinoma; CIMC; Immunotherapy; Preclinical models

类别

资金

  1. Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT), Ministry of Science and Education, Portugal [SFRH/BD/79158/2011]
  2. Operational Competitiveness and Internationalization Program (FEDER/COMPETE/POCI) - European Investment Funds [POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006958]
  3. FCT [UID/AGR/04033/2013]
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/79158/2011] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) in humans is the most aggressive form of mammary gland cancer and shares clinical, pathologic, and molecular patterns of disease with canine inflammatory mammary carcinoma (CIMC). Despite the use of multimodal therapeutic approaches, including targeted therapies, the prognosis for IBC/CIMC remains poor. The aim of this review is to critically analyze IBC and CIMC in terms of biology and clinical features. While rodent cancer models have formed the basis of our understanding of cancer biology, the translation of this knowledge into improved outcomes has been limited. However, it is possible that a comparative one health approach to research, using a natural canine model of the disease, may help advance our knowledge on the biology of the disease. This will translate into better clinical outcomes for both species. We propose that CIMC has the potential to be a useful model for developing and testing novel therapies for IBC. Further, this strategy could significantly improve and accelerate the design and establishment of new clinical trials to identify novel and improved therapies for this devastating disease in a more predictable way. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据