4.7 Article

Bioremediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated soils in cold regions: Development of a pre-optimized biostimulation biopile-scale field assay in Antarctica

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 590, 期 -, 页码 194-203

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.204

关键词

Potter cove; Geomembrane; Antarctic soils; Response-surface methodology; Soil pollution, diesel contamination

资金

  1. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica (ANPCyT) [PICTO 2010-0124]
  2. Universidad de Buenos Aires [UBA 20020100100378]
  3. European Commission [318718]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bioremediation proved to be an effective approach to deal with soil contamination, especially in isolated, cold environments such as Antarctica. Biostimulation, involving the addition of macronutrients -mainly nitrogen and phosphorous-is considered the simplest and cheapest bioremediation process. Optimizing the levels of these nutrients is a key step prior to the application of a biostimulation strategy. In this work, N and P levels, optimized by Response Surface Methodology (RSM) at lab-scale, were applied to an Antarctic hydrocarbon contaminated soil. The process was performed on-site, using high density polyethylene geomembranes (800 mu m) to isolate treated soil from the surroundings and under environmental conditions at Carlini station (Antarctica) during 50 days. Two 0.5 ton biopiles were used as experimental units; a control biopile (CC), and a biostimulated system (BS), amended with N and P. At the end of the assay, hydrocarbon removal was significantly higher in BS system compared to CC ( 75.79% and 49.54% respectively), showing that the applied strategy was effective enough to perform a field-assay in Antarctica that significantly reduce soil contamination levels; and proving that RSM represents a fundamental tool for the optimization of nutrient levels to apply during bioremediation of fuel contaminated cold soils. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据