4.7 Article

Mechanism and performance for adsorption of 2-chlorophenol onto zeolite with surfactant by one-step process from aqueous phase

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 581, 期 -, 页码 550-558

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.163

关键词

Zeolite; Surfactant; 2-chlorophenol; One-step process; Adsorption

资金

  1. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University, Ministry of Education, China [NCET-12-0429]
  2. Applied Basic Research Programs of Science and Technology Commission Foundation of Wuhan [201406010101010063]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To decrease the power, material, and time consumption in wastewater treatment, a one-step process was performed to remove 2-chlorophenol (2-CP) from aqueous phase using zeolite and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB). Compared with the traditional two-step process, the one-step process used in this study achieved almost eight times higher 2-CP adsorption capacity within a shorter time and maintained high removal efficiencies (around 65%) in reuse tests, thus becoming an efficient and economically acceptable alternative process. For the one-step process, the kinetic data fitted well with a nonlinear pseudo-second-order model, and the isotherm data fitted well with the Dubinin-Astakhov (DA) model. The uptake of 2-CP was highly dependent on pH, increasing in the pH range of 3-6. The enhanced 2-CP removal in a one-step adsorption process can be explained by the larger amount of surfactant loading (>= 0.056 mmol/g), as determined from the total organic carbon (TOC) and zeta potential. Due to the formation of a loose CTAB bilayer, the hydroph6bic partition and the interaction with the positively charged head of CTAB bilayers were decisive for the enhancement of pollutant adsorption. Therefore, organic pollutants could be removed from water alongside the synthesis of hydrophobic zeolite in a one-step process, which is a promising technology for the in-situ treatment of organic wastewater.(C) 2016 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据