4.7 Article

Shifts in soil microbial metabolic activities and community structures along a salinity gradient of irrigation water in a typical arid region of China

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 598, 期 -, 页码 64-70

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.105

关键词

Saline water; Functional diversity; Soil bacteria; Community structure; Metagenomics

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41501113, 31270482, 41471210, 51479089]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2013M542407, 2014T70950]
  3. International Postdoctoral Exchange Fellowship Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Saline water irrigation can change soil environment, which thereby influence soil microbial process. Based on a field experiment, the shifts in soil microbial metabolic activities and community structures under five irrigation salinities were studied using Biolog and metagenomic methods in this study. The results demonstrated that microbial metabolic activities were greatly restrained in saline water irrigated soils, as average well color development (AWCD) reduced under all saline water irrigation treatments. Although no significant difference in carbon substrate utilization of all six categories was observed among Mild, Medium, High and Severe treatments, the consumption of sole carbon source was significantly varied. Especially, asparagine, galacturonic, putrescine and 4-benzoic acid played a decisive role in dominating the differences. Soil bacterial richness and diversity increased with irrigation salinity while the number of bacterial phyla decreased. Three significantly increased (Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria and Chloroflexi), two decreased (Planctomycetes, Bacteroidetes) and two irresponsive (Gemmatimonadetes and Acidobacteria) phyla were observed as the dominant groups in saline water irrigated soils. The results presented here could improve the understanding of the soil biological process under saline circumstance. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据