4.3 Article

Serum interleukin-6 level is associated with response to infliximab in ulcerative colitis

期刊

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 53, 期 5, 页码 579-585

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2017.1403647

关键词

Infliximab; tumor necrosis factor; ulcerative colitis; interleukin-6; sMAdCAM

资金

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K08957] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Infliximab is effective in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC); however, one-third of patients do not respond and require additional therapies such as other biologic agents. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze the association between pro-inflammatory molecules and clinical efficacy to elucidate possible mechanisms for the non-response to infliximab to aid in treatment selection.Materials and method: Patients with moderate-to-severe active UC receiving infliximab in our hospital between 2010 and 2016 for whom pre-treatment serum samples were available were retrospectively evaluated. We analyzed the association between serum interleukin (IL)-6, tumor necrosis factor- (TNF-) and soluble mucosal vascular addressin cell adhesion molecule-1 (sMAdCAM-1) and the clinical efficacy of infliximab. The primary endpoint was clinical response at the end of the induction period.Results: Forty-one patients were included in this study. After induction therapy, 27 patients (65.9%) showed a clinical response. Serum IL-6 levels were significantly lower in responders than in non-responders (p=.012), whereas no significant differences were noted in other factors including sMAdCAM-1 and TNF-. Multivariate analysis identified that serum IL-6 level (odds ratio=0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-0.96; p=.027) was independently associated with response to infliximab.Conclusions: Serum IL-6 level is associated with response to infliximab in UC. Elevated concentrations of IL-6 may provide insight to the mechanism of non-response to infliximab.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据