4.8 Article

Chemical Reactions of Portland Cement with Aqueous CO2 and Their Impacts on Cement's Mechanical Properties under Geologic CO2 Sequestration Conditions

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 49, 期 10, 页码 6335-6343

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es5063488

关键词

-

资金

  1. Consortium for Clean Coal Utilization
  2. National Science Foundation [EAR-1057117]
  3. Center for Nanoscale Control of Geologic CO2, an Energy Frontier Research Center - U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  4. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-12-1-0059]
  5. Directorate For Geosciences
  6. Division Of Earth Sciences [1057117] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To provide information on wellbore cement integrity in the application of geologic CO2 sequestration (GCS), chemical and mechanical alterations were. analyzed for cement paste samples reacted for 10 days. under GCS conditions. The reactions were at 95 degrees C and had 100 bar of either N-2 (control condition) or CO2 contacting the reaction brine solution with an ionic strength of 0.5 M adjusted by NaCl. Chemical analyses showed that the 3.0 cm X 1.1 cm x 0.3 cm samples Were significantly attacked by aqueous CO2 and developed layer structures with a total attacked depth Of 1220 mu m. Microscale mechanical property analyses showed that the hardness and indentation modulus of the carbonated layer were 2-3 tithes greater than for the intact cement, but those in the portlandite-dissolved region decreased by similar to 50%. The strength and elastic modulus of the bulk cement samples were reduced by 93% and 84%, respectively. The properties of the microscale regions, layer structure, microcracks, and swelling of the outer layers combined to affect the overall mechanical properties. These findings improve understanding of wellbore integrity from both chemical and mechanical viewpoints and can be utilized to improve the safety and efficiency of CO2 storage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据