4.1 Article

Hereditary spastic paraplegia: More than an upper motor neuron disease

期刊

REVUE NEUROLOGIQUE
卷 173, 期 5, 页码 352-360

出版社

MASSON EDITEUR
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2017.03.034

关键词

Spastic paraplegia; SPG; Motor neuron disease; Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; Neurodegeneration; Motor neuron

资金

  1. European Union (7th FP NEUROMICS, E-Rare Neurolipid and Prepare)
  2. VERUM Foundation
  3. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (SPATAX-QUEST)
  4. Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hereditary spastic paraplegias (HSPs) are a group of rare inherited neurological diseases characterized by extreme heterogeneity in both their clinical manifestations and genetic backgrounds. Based on symptoms, HSPs can be divided into pure forms, presenting with pyramidal signs leading to lower-limb spasticity, and complex forms, when additional neurological or extraneurological symptoms are detected. The clinical diversity of HSPs partially reflects their underlying genetic backgrounds. To date, 76 loci and 58 corresponding genes [spastic paraplegia genes (SPGs)] have been linked to HSPs. The genetic diagnosis is further complicated by the fact that causative mutations of HSP can be inherited through all possible modes of transmission (autosomal-dominant and-recessive, X-linked, maternal), with some genes showing multiple inheritance patterns. The pathogenic mutations of SPGs primarily lead to progressive degeneration of the upper motor neurons (UMNs) comprising corticospinal tracts. However, it is possible to observe lower-limb muscle atrophy and fasciculations on clinical examination that are clear signs of lower motor neuron (LMN) involvement. The purpose of this review is to classify HSPs based on their degree of motor neuron involvement, distinguishing forms in which only UMNs are affected from those involving both UMN and LMN degeneration, and to describe their differential diagnosis from diseases such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. (C) 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据