4.0 Article

Depression, stress and anxiety in medical students: A cross-sectional comparison between students from different semesters

期刊

REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA
卷 63, 期 1, 页码 21-28

出版社

ASSOC MEDICA BRASILEIRA
DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.63.01.21

关键词

medical education; depression; anxiety; stress; medical students.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To compare the prevalence of anxiety, depression, and stress in medical students from all semesters of a Brazilian medical school and assess their respective associated factors. Method: A cross-sectional study of students from the twelve semesters of a Brazilian medical school was carried out. Students filled out a questionnaire including sociodemographics, religiosity (DUREL - Duke Religion Index), and mental health (DASS-21 - Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale). The students were compared for mental health variables (Chi-squared/ ANOVA). Linear regression models were employed to assess factors associated with DASS-21 scores. Results: 761 (75.4%) students answered the questionnaire; 34.6% reported depressive symptomatology, 37.2% showed anxiety symptoms, and 47.1% stress symptoms. Significant differences were found for: anxiety - ANOVA: [F = 2.536, p= 0.004]between first and tenth (p= 0.048) and first and eleventh (p= 0.025) semesters; depression - ANOVA: [F = 2.410, p= 0.006] between first and second semesters (p= 0.045); and stress - ANOVA: [F = 2.968, p= 0.001] between seventh and twelfth (p= 0.044), tenth and twelfth (p= 0.011), and eleventh and twelfth (p= 0.001) semesters. The following factors were associated with (a) stress: female gender, anxiety, and depression; (b) depression: female gender, intrinsic religiosity, anxiety, and stress; and (c) anxiety: course semester, depression, and stress. Conclusion: Our findings revealed high levels of depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms in medical students, with marked differences among course semesters. Gender and religiosity appeared to influence the mental health of the medical students.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据