4.3 Article

Shedding light on sporopollenin chemistry, with reference to UV reconstructions

期刊

REVIEW OF PALAEOBOTANY AND PALYNOLOGY
卷 238, 期 -, 页码 1-6

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2016.11.014

关键词

Sporopollenin; Ultraviolet-B; Fourier transform infrared microspectroscopy; Phenolic compounds; Lycopodium

资金

  1. Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) [NE/K005294/1]
  2. Enhanced Transnational Access To Abisko Scientific Research Station grant from the European Union [FP6 506004]
  3. NERC [NE/K005294/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/K005294/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sporopollenin, which forms the outer wall of pollen and spores, contains a chemical signature of ultraviolet-B flux via concentrations of UV-B absorbing compounds (UACs), providing a proxy for reconstructing UV irradiance through time. Although Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy provides an efficient means of measuring UAC concentrations, nitrogen-containing compounds have the potential to bias the aromatic and hydroxyl bands used to quantify and standardise UAC abundances. Here, we explore the presence and possible influence of nitrogen in UV reconstruction via an FTIR study of Lycopodium spores from a natural shading gradient. We show that the UV-sensitive aromatic peak at 1510 cm(-1) is clearly distinguishable from the amide II peak at 1550 cm(-1), and the decrease in aromatic content with increased shading can be reconstructed using standardisation approaches that do not rely on the 3300 cm(-1) hydroxyl band. Isolation of the sporopollenin results in the loss of nitrogen related peaks from the FTIR spectra, while the aromatic gradient remains. This confirms the lack of nitrogen in sporopollenin and its limited potential for impacting on palaeo-UV reconstructions. FTIR is therefore an appropriate tool for quantifying UACs in spores and pollen, and information on UV flux should be obtainable from fossil or processed samples. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据