4.4 Article

Perinatal administration of bisphenol A alters the expression of tight junction proteins in the uterus and reduces the implantation rate

期刊

REPRODUCTIVE TOXICOLOGY
卷 69, 期 -, 页码 106-120

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2017.02.009

关键词

Bisphenol-A; Implantation; Tight junctions; Claudins; ZO-1

资金

  1. PAPIIT [IA202814, IA209316]
  2. PAIP from the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) [5000-9141]
  3. CONACYT [237241]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We studied the effect of bisphenol-A (BPA) administration to rats, during the perinatal period, on the fertility of F1 generation and on the expression of tight junction (TJ) proteins in the uterus during early pregnancy. Pregnant Wistar dams (F0) received: BPA-L (0.05 mg/kg/day), BPA-H (20 mg/kg/day) or vehicle, from gestational day (GD) 6 to lactation day 21. F1 female pups were mated at 3 months of age and sacrificed at GD 1, 3, 6, and 7. Serum hormonal levels, ovulation rate, number of implantation sites and expression of TJ proteins in the uterus of Fl females were evaluated. BPA treatment induced no change in ovulation rate, but induced alterations in progesterone (P-4) and estradiol (E-2) serum levels, and in implantation rate. With regards to TJ proteins, BPA-H increased claudin-1 during all GDs; eliminated the peaks of claudins -3 and -4 at GD 3 and 6, respectively; and decreased claudin-7 at GD 6, ZO-1 from GD 1-6, and claudin-3 at GD 7 in stromal cells. BPA-L instead, eliminated claudin-3 peak at GD 3, increased claudin-4 and decreased claudin-7 from GD.1-6, decreased claudin-1 at GD 3 and 7 and claudin-4 at GD 7 in stromal cells. BPA-L also decreased ZO-1 at GDs 1 and 3 and increased ZO-1 at GD 6. Thus, BPA treatment during perinatal period perturbed, when the animals reached adulthood and became pregnant, the particular expression of TJ proteins in the uterine epithelium and reduced in consequence the number of implantation sites. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据