4.8 Review

Stochastic characterization of electricity energy markets including plug-in electric vehicles

期刊

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
卷 69, 期 -, 页码 112-122

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.094

关键词

Deterministic energy market; Plug in electric vehicle (PEV); Stochastic electricity energy market; Total cost; Uncertainty

资金

  1. Islamic Azad University, Shahre-Qods Branch

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs) have several capabilities to help the power system; for instance, one of them is participation in the energy market via vehicle to grid (V2G) technology. Due to some uncertain parameters such as battery state of charge (SOC), PEV availability, etc, they have stochastic behavior and it can affect the settlement of energy market. Accordingly, this paper proposes a framework for the stochastic clearing of electricity energy market in the presence of the PEVs while the uncertainties of PEVs and the synchronous generators are considered. The proposed stochastic energy market is cleared in two steps: at the first step, the random scenarios are generated using Monte-Carlo Simulation (MCS); then, at the second step, the stochastic market-clearing procedure is implemented as a series of deterministic optimization problems (scenarios) including non-contingent scenario and different post-contingency states. The network Total Cost (TC) is defined as an objective function and it is minimized for each scenario. In other words, the stochastic energy market is cleared based on the selection of the cheaper and proper energy providers, PEVs and synchronous generators, while the constraints are satisfied. The proposed optimization formulation is in the form of mixed integer nonlinear programming. Consequently, a heuristic based particle swarm optimization method has been adopted for the solution strategy. The effectiveness of the proposed method is examined based on a real case low voltage distribution system with 134 nodes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据