4.7 Article

Trends in downward surface solar radiation from satellites and ground observations over Europe during 1983-2010

期刊

REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT
卷 189, 期 -, 页码 108-117

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2016.11.018

关键词

Surface solar radiation; Satellite-derived; All-sky irradiance; Temporal inhomogeneities; Decadal changes; Brightening; Europe

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [JCI-2012-12508, CGL2014-55976-R, CGL2014-52135-C3-1-R, CGL2014-517221-REDT]
  2. FPI [BES-2011-049095]
  3. FPU [FPU AP2010-0917]
  4. European Commission [LIFE12 ENV/ES/000536]
  5. Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD)
  6. EUMETSAT [CM AVS15_01]
  7. Swiss National Science Foundation [200021 135395, 200020 159938]
  8. FEDER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Trends of all-sky downward surface solar radiation (SSR) from satellite-derived data over Europe (1983-2010) are first presented. The results show a widespread (i.e., non-local dimension) increase in the major part of Europe, especially since the mid-1990s in the central and northern areas and in springtime. There is a mean increase of SSR of at least 2 W m(-2) per decade from 1983 to 2010 over the whole Europe, which, taking into account that the satellite-derived product lacks of aerosol variations, can be mostly related to a decrease in the cloud radiative effects over Europe. Secondly, residual series have been derived as the result of the difference between ground based and satellite-derived all-sky SSR data. The residual mean series points to a significant increase during the period 1983-2010, with higher rates of around 2 W m(-2) per decade over central and eastern Europe. The spatial variation of these residual time series, which are in line with clear-sky SSR trends over Europe reported in the literature, seem to suggest that these differences in the residual series are not just explained by calibration issues in the satellite-derived product. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据