4.5 Article

Risk assessment of agricultural pesticides in water, sediment, and fish from Owan River, Edo State, Nigeria

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-015-4840-8

关键词

Pesticides; Chromatography; Risk quotient; Estimated daily intake; Hazard quotient; Exposure assessment

资金

  1. Japan Society for Promotion of Science
  2. National Centre for Energy and Environment (NCEE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The distribution of pesticides in water, sediments, Clarias gariepinus, and Tilapia zilli from the Owan River was investigated to evaluate the pollution status and potential hazard in the river system. A total of 16 pesticides were analyzed using gas chromatography (GC) equipped with electron capture detector (ECD). The concentration of pesticide residues ranged from ND to 0.43 mu g/l for water samples, 0.82 to 2.14 mu g/kg/dw for sediment, 0.04 to 2.34 mu g/kg/ww for C. gariepinus, and 0.02 to 1.73 mu g/kg/ww for T. zilli. High concentrations of organochlorine pesticides, specifically benzenehexachloride (alpha-BHC, gamma-BHC, and beta-BHC) observed in all environmental media, are an indication of the current illegal use of banned pesticides for agricultural activities in the region. Analysis of data showed a strong correlation (r(2)=0.7) between total organic carbon (TOC) and total pesticide residues in sediment samples. Meanwhile, risk quotient estimates for heptachlor epoxide, dieldrin, endrin, dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (4,4'-DDT), endosulfan I, endosulfan II, endosulfan aldehyde, and phosphomethylglycine showed potential risk to aquatic organism under observed mean concentrations (risk quotient (RQ)>= 1). Estimated average daily intake (EADI) for organochlorine pesticides (gamma-BHC, heptachlor epoxide, aldrin, dieldrin, and endrin) was above their respective acceptable average daily intake (ADI), while hazard quotient for each of these pesticides was above the unity value (1). This indicates that there is a potential cancer risk for the local residents with life time consumption of pesticidecontaminated fish.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据