4.7 Article

Improved tensile properties of Al0.5CoCrFeNi high-entropy alloy by tailoring microstructures

期刊

RARE METALS
卷 40, 期 9, 页码 2508-2513

出版社

NONFERROUS METALS SOC CHINA
DOI: 10.1007/s12598-016-0860-y

关键词

High-entropy alloys; Heat treatment; Microstructure; Tensile properties

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of heat treatment on microstructure and tensile properties of the Al0.5CoCrFeNi high-entropy alloy was investigated, showing significant improvements in both aspects. Heat treatment altered the morphology of bcc phases and enhanced tensile properties, with ultimate tensile strength increased by approximately 60% under 850 degrees C heat treatment. Fracture analysis indicated different fracture modes under various heat-treated conditions, with a mixture of quasi-cleavage and ductile fracture observed at 850 degrees C.
The effect of heat treatment on microstructure and tensile properties of as-cast Al0.5CoCrFeNi high-entropy alloy was investigated by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) equipped with energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), and tensile tests. The results show that heat treatment strongly affects the microstructure, particularly the morphology of bcc phases, and improves tensile properties. Microstructure analysis reveals that rod-shaped and elliptoid phases appear in the matrix after heat treatment at 1150 degrees C. Besides, under 850 degrees C heat-treated condition, ultimate tensile strength increases by about 60% without sacrificing much plasticity, which can be attributed to the content of bcc phases and fine precipitates dispersed in the dendrites. For other heat-treated conditions, tensile ductility increases by at least 30%, especially 60% for heat treatment at 450 degrees C, and strength also improves. Fracture analysis indicates that the fracture mode of heat treatment at 850 degrees C is a mixture of quasi-cleavage and ductile fracture, while the other heat-treated conditions show the mode of ductile fracture.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据