4.2 Review

Collaborative Care for Women With Depression: A Systematic Review

期刊

PSYCHOSOMATICS
卷 58, 期 1, 页码 11-18

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.psym.2016.09.002

关键词

women's health; primary care; depressive disorder; anxiety disorder; mental health services

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The collaborative care model has been found to be effective for depression management in various primary care populations; however, no review has synthesized trials tailored to treat women. Objective: The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the current evidence for collaborative depression care for women. Methodology: We searched for English language articles via MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and reference lists of key articles. Published English language studies were included if they described collaborative care models that targeted women, regardless of study design. Studies were excluded if components of collaborative care were absent (based on criteria described by the Advancing Integrated Mental Health Solutions Center at the University of Washington), if the focus of the intervention was not women, if the studies were not conducted in primary care or gynecological settings, or if there were no outcome data. Results: This review resulted in 7 articles that met the inclusion criteria. Included studies were 6 randomized controlled trials and 1 observational study. Among those, 4 studies focused on pregnant or postpartum women. In general, collaborative care interventions focusing on women were more effective than usual care for the management of depressive disorders in women with 5 of the 6 randomized studies showing positive depression outcomes. Conclusions: There is evidence that collaborative care interventions are effective for treating depressed women in nonmental health settings. Future studies should examine differences in implementation of collaborative care in real world settings and define modcations needed based on a woman's reproductive life stage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据