4.1 Article

Screening of antigenic vesicular fluid proteins of Echinococcus multilocularis as potential viability biomarkers to monitor drug response in alveolar echinococcosis patients

期刊

PROTEOMICS CLINICAL APPLICATIONS
卷 11, 期 11-12, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/prca.201700010

关键词

Alveolar echinococcosis; immunoproteomics; vesicular fluid; viability biomarker

资金

  1. French Ministry of Health (National Reference Center for Alveolar Echinococcosis)
  2. French Ministry of Health (Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique PHRC Echino-Vista)
  3. University of Bourgogne Franche-Comte [UMR CNRS 6249]
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation [31003A_141039/1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: The only drugs available to treat alveolar echinococcosis (AE) are mostly parasitostatic and in many cases prescribed for life. Decision criteria for discontinuation rely on the absence of parasitic viability. The aim of the present study is to search for candidate proteins that may exhibit good potential as biomarkers for viability. Experimental design: Sixteen serum samples (five healthy controls, 11 patients with AE), are used. AE-patients are classified into three groups Cured (n = 2), ABZ-responders (n = 4) and ABZ-nonresponders (n = 5). Immunoreactive proteins from vesicular fluid (VF) are identified and quantified by LC-MS/MS analysis after immunoprecipitation (IP) using all 16 serum samples. Results: Shotgun analysis of VF lead to the identification of 107 E. multilocularis proteins. Comparative proteomics reveal nine proteins more abundant in IP eluates from ABZ-nonresponder patients (cathepsin b, prosaposin a preprotein, actin modulator protein, fucosidase alpha L1 tissue, gluthatione-S-tranferase, beta galactosidase, elongation factor 2, H17g protein tegumental antigen, and NiemannPick C2 protein). Conclusions and clinical relevance: Detection of antibodies against these proteins by ELISA could be helpful to monitor the course of alveolar echinococcosis under albendazole (ABZ) treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据