4.8 Review

Dynamically tunable cell culture platforms for tissue engineering and mechanobiology

期刊

PROGRESS IN POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 65, 期 -, 页码 53-82

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2016.09.004

关键词

Dynamic cell culture; Stimuli-responsive material; Hydrogels; Mechanobiology; 4D biology; Tissue engineering

资金

  1. American Heart Association (AHA) Scientist Development Grant [13SDG14560076]
  2. National Institutes of Health R21 Grant [R21AR064395]
  3. Muscular Dystrophy Association Research Grant [MDA255907]
  4. International Collaborative R&D Program through KIAT - MOTIE [N0000894]
  5. University of Washington Faculty Startup Grant
  6. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human tissues are sophisticated ensembles of many distinct cell types embedded in the complex, but well-defined, structures of the extracellular matrix (ECM). Dynamic biochemical, physicochemical, and mechano-structural changes in the ECM define and regulate tissue-specific cell behaviors. To recapitulate this complex environment in vitro, dynamic polymer-based biomaterials have emerged as powerful tools to probe and direct active changes in cell function. The rapid evolution of polymerization chemistries, structural modulation, and processing technologies, as well as the incorporation of stimuli-responsiveness, now permit synthetic microenvironments to capture much of the dynamic complexity of native tissue. These platforms are comprised not only of natural polymers chemically and molecularly similar to ECM, but those fully synthetic in origin. Here, we review recent in vitro efforts to mimic the dynamic microenvironment comprising native tissue ECM from the viewpoint of material design. We also discuss how these dynamic polymer-based biomaterials are being used in fundamental cell mechanobiology studies, as well as toward efforts in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.(C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据