4.6 Article

Identification of Green, Oolong and Black Teas in China via Wavelet Packet Entropy and Fuzzy Support Vector Machine

期刊

ENTROPY
卷 17, 期 10, 页码 6663-6682

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/e17106663

关键词

tea identification; wavelet packet entropy; Shannon entropy; wavelet analysis; support vector machine (SVM); fuzzy SVM; information theory

资金

  1. NSFC [61273243, 51407095]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20150982, BK20150983]
  3. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of 3D Printing Equipment and Manufacturing [BM2013006]
  4. Key Supporting Science and Technology Program (Industry) of Jiangsu Province [BE2012201, BE2013012-2, BE2014009-3]
  5. Program of Natural Science Research of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions [13KJB460011, 14KJB520021]
  6. Special Funds for Scientific and Technological Achievement Transformation Project in Jiangsu Province [BA2013058]
  7. Nanjing Normal University Research Foundation for Talented Scholars [2013119XGQ0061, 2014119XGQ0080]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To develop an automatic tea-category identification system with a high recall rate, we proposed a computer-vision and machine-learning based system, which did not require expensive signal acquiring devices and time-consuming procedures. We captured 300 tea images using a 3-CCD digital camera, and then extracted 64 color histogram features and 16 wavelet packet entropy (WPE) features to obtain color information and texture information, respectively. Principal component analysis was used to reduce features, which were fed into a fuzzy support vector machine (FSVM). Winner-take-all (WTA) was introduced to help the classifier deal with this 3-class problem. The 10 x 10-fold stratified cross-validation results show that the proposed FSVM + WTA method yields an overall recall rate of 97.77%, higher than 5 existing methods. In addition, the number of reduced features is only five, less than or equal to existing methods. The proposed method is effective for tea identification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据