4.6 Article

Characterization and proteomic profile of extracellular vesicles from peritoneal dialysis efflux

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 12, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176987

关键词

-

资金

  1. National R+D+I [PI16/00072]
  2. ISCIII
  3. European Regional Development Fund [2014SGR804]
  4. Instituto de Salud Carlos III-Red de Investigacion Renal (REDinREN) [RD16/0009]
  5. Fundacio Cellex
  6. Beatriu de Pinos-B contract from Agencia de Gestio d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca (AGAUR)-Generalitat de Catalunya [2014BPB00118]
  7. Spanish Sistema Nacionalde Salud (SNS-ISCIII)
  8. Direccio d'Estrategia i Coordinacio Catalan Health Department [CES07/015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) is considered the best option for a cost-effective mid-term dialysis in patients with Chronic Renal Failure. However, functional failure of the peritoneal membrane (PM) force many patients to stop PD treatment and start haemodialysis. Currently, PM functionality is monitored by the peritoneal equilibration test, a tedious technique that often show changes when the membrane damage is advanced. As in other pathologies, the identification and characterization of extracellular vesicles (EVs) in the peritoneal dialysis efflux (PDE) may represent a non-invasive alternative to identify biomarkers of membrane failure. Using size-exclusion chromatography, we isolated EVs from PDE in a group of patients. Vesicles were characterized by the presence of tetraspanin markers, nanoparticle tracking analysis profile, cryo-electron microscopy and mass spectrometry. Here, we report the isolation and characterization of PDE-EVs. Based on mass spectrometry, we have found a set of well-conserved proteins among patients. Interestingly, the peptide profile also revealed remarkable changes between newly enrolled and longer-treated PD patients. These results are the first step to the identification of PDE-EVs based new markers of PM damage, which could support clinicians in their decision-making in a non-invasive manner.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据