4.7 Article

Exogenous application of poly-γ-glutamic acid enhances stress defense in Brassica napus L. seedlings by inducing cross-talks between Ca2+, H2O2, brassinolide, and jasmonic acid in leaves

期刊

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 118, 期 -, 页码 460-470

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.07.015

关键词

Poly-gamma-glutamic acid; Brassica napus L; Ca2+ signal; H2O2; Brassinolide; jasmonic acid

资金

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863) [2015AA020951]
  2. Key Projects in the National Science & Technology Pillar Program [2015BAD15B04]
  3. National Nature Science Foundation of China [21506098]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu [BK20150946]
  5. Natural Science Research Project in Jiangsu Province [15KJB530007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Poly-gamma-glutamic acid (gamma-PGA) is a microbe-secreted isopeptide shown to promote growth and enhance crop stress tolerance. However, its downstream signaling pathways are unknown. Here, we studied gamma-PGA-induced tolerance to salt and cold stresses. Pretreatment with gamma-PGA contributed to enhance stress tolerance of canola seedlings by promoting proline accumulation and total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC) improvement. Further, Ca2+, H2O2, brassinolide, and jasmonic acid were found to be involved in the gamma-PGA-induced process. First, using signal blockers, we concluded that gamma-PGA activated Ca2+ fluctuations in canola seedling leaves. Second, the activated Ca2+ further elicited H2O2 production by Ca2+-binding proteins CBL9, CPK4, and CPK5. Third, the H2O2 signal promoted brassinolide and jasmonic acid biosynthesis by upregulating key genes (DWF4 and LOX2, respectively) for synthesizing these compounds. Lastly, brassinolide and jasmonic acid increased H2O2 which promoted praline accumulation and T-AOC improvement and further enhanced Ca2+-binding proteins including CaM, CBL10, and CPK9. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据