4.6 Article

Multi-feature machine learning model for automatic segmentation of green fractional vegetation cover for high-throughput field phenotyping

期刊

PLANT METHODS
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13007-017-0253-8

关键词

Field phenotyping; Learning-based segmentation; Fractional cover; Field Scanalyzer; RGB images

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) of the UK [BB/J00426X/1, BB/P016855/1]
  2. BBSRC [BBS/E/C/000I0220, BBS/E/C/00005202] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Accurately segmenting vegetation from the background within digital images is both a fundamental and a challenging task in phenotyping. The performance of traditional methods is satisfactory in homogeneous environments, however, performance decreases when applied to images acquired in dynamic field environments. Results: In this paper, a multi-feature learning method is proposed to quantify vegetation growth in outdoor field conditions. The introduced technique is compared with the state-of the-art and other learning methods on digital images. All methods are compared and evaluated with different environmental conditions and the following criteria: (1) comparison with ground-truth images, (2) variation along a day with changes in ambient illumination, (3) comparison with manual measurements and (4) an estimation of performance along the full life cycle of a wheat canopy. Conclusion: The method described is capable of coping with the environmental challenges faced in field conditions, with high levels of adaptiveness and without the need for adjusting a threshold for each digital image. The proposed method is also an ideal candidate to process a time series of phenotypic information throughout the crop growth acquired in the field. Moreover, the introduced method has an advantage that it is not limited to growth measurements only but can be applied on other applications such as identifying weeds, diseases, stress,

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据