4.7 Article

Entire nucleotide sequences of Gossypium raimondii and G.arboreum mitochondrial genomes revealed A-genome species as cytoplasmic donor of the allotetraploid species

期刊

PLANT BIOLOGY
卷 19, 期 3, 页码 484-493

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/plb.12536

关键词

Comparative genomics; Gossypium mitochondrial genome; phylogenetic analysis; unique regions

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31671741]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cotton (Gossypium spp.) is commonly grouped into eight diploid genomic groups, designated A-G and K, and an allotetraploid genomic group, AD. Gossypium raimondii (D-5) and G.arboreum (A(2)) are the putative contributors to the progenitor of G.hirsutum (AD(1)), the economically important fibre-producing cotton species. Mitochondrial DNA from week-old etiolated seedlings was extracted from isolated organelles using discontinuous sucrose density gradient method. Mitochondrial genomes were sequenced, assembled, annotated and analysed in orderly. Gossypium raimondii (D-5) and G.arboreum (A(2)) mitochondrial genomes were provided in this study. The mitochondrial genomes of two diploid species harboured circular genome of 643,914bp (D-5) and 687,482bp (A(2)), respectively. They differ in size and number of repeat sequences, both contain illuminating triplicate sequences with 7317 and 10,246bp, respectively, demonstrating dynamic difference and rearranged genome organisations. Comparing the D-5 and A(2) mitogenomes with mitogenomes of tetraploid Gossypium species (AD(1), G.hirsutum; AD(2), G.barbadense), a shared 11kbp fragment loss was detected in allotetraploid species, three regions shared by G.arboreum (A(2)), G.hirsutum (AD(1)) and G.barbadense (AD(2)), while eight regions were specific to G.raimondii (D-5). The presence/absence variations and gene-based phylogeny supported that A-genome is a cytoplasmic donor to the progenitor of allotetraploid species G.hirsutum and G.barbadense. The results present structure variations and phylogeny of Gossypium mitochondrial genome evolution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据