4.7 Article

Temporal dynamics of ultraviolet radiation impacts on litter decomposition in a semi-arid ecosystem

期刊

PLANT AND SOIL
卷 419, 期 1-2, 页码 71-81

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-017-3290-1

关键词

Arid and semi-arid ecosystems; DOC; Microbial decomposition; Photodegradation; PLFA; UV radiation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31522011]
  2. Chinese National Key Development Program for Basic Research [2013CB956304, 2014CB954003]
  3. National 1000 Young Talents Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The emerging consensus posits that ultraviolet (UV) radiation accelerates litter decomposition in xeric environments mainly by preconditioning litter for subsequent microbial decomposition. However, how UV radiation affects the interactions among litter chemistry, microbes, and eventually litter mass during different decomposition stages is still poorly understood. Here, we conducted a 29-month in situ decomposition experiment with litter exposed to ambient and reduced UV in a semi-arid grassland. The decomposition rate for Cleistogenes squarrosa and Stipa krylovii under ambient UV was 82 and 111% greater than that under reduced UV, respectively. UV's positive effect showed three-stage temporal dynamics. During the early stage, UV had no impact on either litter chemistry or mass loss. During the intermediate stage, UV decreased litter carbon concentration and increased dissolved organic carbon concentration, but still had no effect on litter mass. During the late stage, UV exposure increased microbial population size in the surface soil and significantly increased litter mass loss. Overall, our study suggested that UV exposure accelerated litter decomposition first by improving litter biodegradability during the intermediate stage and then by enhancing microbial decomposition during the late stage. More long-term photodegradation experiments are needed to explore the biotic and abiotic interactions during different decomposition stages.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据