4.2 Article

Effect of the Size of Al3(Sc,Zr) Precipitates on the Structure of Multi-Directionally Isothermally Forged Al-Mg-Sc-Zr Alloy

期刊

PHYSICS OF METALS AND METALLOGRAPHY
卷 118, 期 12, 页码 1215-1224

出版社

MAIK NAUKA/INTERPERIODICA/SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1134/S0031918X17120122

关键词

aluminum alloy; dispersoids; multi-directional isothermal forging; microstructure; continuous dynamic recrystallization

资金

  1. Russian Science Foundation [16-19-10152]
  2. Russian Science Foundation [16-19-10152] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of Al-3(Sc,Zr) dispersoids on the evolution of the cast Al-Mg-Sc-Zr alloy structure under multi-directional isothermal forging (MIF) has been investigated. The alloy, which has an equiaxed grain structure with a grain size of similar to 25 mu m and contains dispersoids 5-10 and 20-50 nm in size after onestage (at 360A degrees C for 6 h) and two-stage (360A degrees C for 6 h + 520A degrees C for 1 h) annealing, respectively, was deformed at 325A degrees C (similar to 0.65 T (m)) up to cumulative strains of e = 8.4. In the initial stages of MIF, new fine (sub)grains surrounded by low-angle and high-angle boundaries (HABs) were formed near the initial grain boundaries. With increasing strain, the volume fraction and misorientation of these crystallites increased, which led to the replacement of a coarse-grained structure with a fine-grained one with a grain size of similar to 1.5-2.0 mu m. Dynamic recrystallization occurred in accordance to a continuous mechanism and was controlled by the interaction of lattice dislocations and/or (sub)grain boundaries with dispersoids that effectively inhibited the migration of boundaries, as well as the rearrangement of lattice dislocations and their annihilation. The particle size and the density of their distribution significantly affected the parameters of the evolved structure; in an alloy with smaller particles, a structure with a smaller grain size and a larger HAB fraction developed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据