4.7 Article

A combined negative selection algorithm-particle swarm optimization for an email spam detection system

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2014.11.001

关键词

Negative selection algorithm; Differential evolution; Particle swarm optimization spam detectors

资金

  1. Ministry of Education Malaysia [01G72]
  2. Ministry of Science, Technology & Innovations Malaysia [4S062]
  3. Moravian-Silesian Region [RRC/05/2013]
  4. FIM excellence project
  5. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Email is a convenient means of communication throughout the entire world today. The increased popularity of email spam in both text and images requires a real-time protection mechanism for the media flow. The previous approach has been limited by the adaptive nature of unsolicited email spam. This research introduces an email detection system that is designed based on an improvement in the negative selection algorithm. Furthermore, particle swarm optimization (PSO) was implemented to improve the random detector generation in the negative selection algorithm (NSA). The algorithm generates detectors in the random detector generation phase of the negative selection algorithm. The combined NSA-PSO uses a local outlier factor (LOF) as the fitness function for the detector generation. The detector generation process is terminated when the expected spam coverage is reached. A distance measure and a threshold value are employed to enhance the distinctiveness between the non-spam and spam detectors after the detector generation. The implementation and evaluation of the models are analyzed. The results show that the accuracy of the proposed NSA-PSO model is better than the accuracy of the standard NSA model. The proposed model with the best accuracy is further used to differentiate between spam and non-spam in a network that is developed based on a client-server network for spam detection. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据