4.7 Article

Turbulent boundary layer response to large-scale wavy topographies

期刊

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
卷 29, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4989719

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  2. National Science Foundation Grant [CBET-0923106]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Flat-plate turbulent boundary layer adjustment to large-scale 2D and 3Dwavy topographieswas experimentally studied using high-resolution particle image velocimetry in a refractive-index-matching flume. The flow was characterized at a Reynolds number Re = 4 x 10(4), based on the channel half height and incoming free-stream velocity. Two ratios of amplitude (a) to incoming boundary layer thickness (delta(0)) were considered for each topography (a /delta(0) = 0.12 and 0.81). The 2D topography is described by a sinusoidal wave in the streamwise direction with an amplitude to wavelength ratio a/lambda(x) = 0.05, while the 3D topography is defined with an additional wave superimposed in the spanwise direction. The results show that the spanwise variability of the topography leads to a much milder response in both a/delta(0) ratios. The regions of strong acceleration and deceleration over the crests and troughs of the topography are reduced over the 3D topography due to the alternate flow path around the 3D elements. Furthermore, the boundary layer thickness and integral parameters experienced milder variations over the 3D topography for both a/delta(0). The Reynolds shear stress shows distinctive evolution with down-stream distance. In the 3D case, maximum Reynolds stress similar to those in the developed region is achieved within the first three wavelengths past the topographic change indicating that the dynamics of the downstream evolution is dominated by vertical diffusion and redistribution. This is in contrast with the 2D case with a/delta(0) = 0.12 where the Reynolds stress did not achieve the levels observed in the developed region. Published by AIP Publishing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据