4.7 Article

China's approach to nuclear safety - From the perspective of policy and institutional system

期刊

ENERGY POLICY
卷 76, 期 -, 页码 161-172

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.11.009

关键词

Nuclear Energy; Safety; Policy; Institution; China

资金

  1. Program for the New Century Excellent Talents [NCET-11-1030]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41301640]
  3. Award Fund for Young Scientists of Shandong Province [BS2012SF015]
  4. Humanities & Social Sciences Project of Shandong Province [14-ZZ-JG-02]
  5. Soft Science Research Plan of Shandong Province [2014RKE27057, 2014RKE27058]
  6. Open Project of State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology [ES201001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nuclear energy plays an important role in the energy sector in the world. It has achieved a rapid development during the past six decades and contributes to over 11% of the world's electricity supply. On the other side, nuclear accidents have triggered substantial debates with a growing public concern on nuclear facilities. Followed by the Fukushima nuclear accident, some developed countries decided to shut down the existing nuclear power plants or to abandon plans to build new ones. Given this background, accelerating the development of nuclear power on the basis of safety in China will make it a bellwether for other countries. China assigns the top priority to the nuclear safety in nuclear energy development and has maintained a good record in this field. The policy and institutional system provide the necessary guarantee for the nuclear energy development and safety management. Furthermore, China's approach to nuclear safety provides a benchmark for the safe development and utilization of nuclear power. This research draws an overall picture of the nuclear energy development and nuclear safety in China from the policy and institutional perspective. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据