4.5 Article

GCH1 mutations are common in Serbian patients with dystonia-parkinsonism: Challenging previously reported prevalence rates of DOPA-responsive dystonia

期刊

PARKINSONISM & RELATED DISORDERS
卷 45, 期 -, 页码 81-84

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2017.09.017

关键词

GCH1; Mutation; DOPA-responsive dystonia; Prevalence

资金

  1. Ministry of Education and Science, Republic of Serbia [ON175090, ON175091]
  2. Hermann and Lilly Schilling Foundation
  3. German Research Foundation (DFG) Research Unit [FOR2488]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: GTP cyclohydrolase 1-deficient DOPA-responsive dystonia, caused by autosomal dominant mutation in the gene coding for GTP cyclohydrolase 1, is a rare disorder with a reported prevalence of 0.5 per million. A correct diagnosis of DRD is crucial, given that this is an exquisitely treatable neurogenetic disorder. Although genetic testing is now widely available, we hypothesize that DRD is still under diagnosed and its prevalence underestimated. Methods: Molecular genetic analysis of the GCH1 gene was performed in a representative cohort of 47 Serbian patients with clinical features of DRD and in their 16 available relatives. The DRD prevalence rate in Serbia was estimated based on population size, catchment area, and the centralized Serbian referral system for rare diseases. Results: We identified 9 different GCH1 mutations in 23 individuals from 11 families, 5 of which are novel. Patients displayed a broad range of clinical phenotypes. The estimated prevalence of GCH1-related DOPA-responsive dystonia in Serbia was 2.96 per million individuals and there was no evidence for a common founder. Conclusions: Our data expand the genotypic spectrum of GCH1 and confirm the broad phenotypic spectrum of DRD in the Serbian population. The number of detected mutation carriers in this sample implies that the frequency of DRD in the Serbian population is considerably higher than expected based on published prevalence rates, suggesting that the prevalence of this treatable disease should be revisited also in other populations. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据